X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Joe Smith" <unknown_kev_cat AT hotmail DOT com>
Subject:  Re: unlink()'s not quite POSIX behavior.
Date:  Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:19:50 -0400
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <f8o20o$kfu$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <f8o1qr$jtk$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; 	format=flowed; 	charset="iso-8859-1"; 	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


"Joe Smith" wrote in message news:f8o1qr$jtk$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org...

Nevermind. I see that the relavent changes to NT_unlink are just very 
recent, and the only problem is that the latest cygwin dll does not incldue 
those changes yet.
You can ignore the previous message. 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/