X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Joe Smith" Subject: unlink()'s not quite POSIX behavior. Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:16:42 -0400 Lines: 37 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com It appears that currently unlink will not immedately remove a file (that has only one link) if a handle to the file is open, but will flag it for deletion once the file handle closes. This is causing a problem with Python 3000. POSIX says: >When the file's link count becomes 0 and no process has the file open, >the space occupied by the file shall be freed and the file shall no longer >be accessible. If one or more processes have the file open when the last >link is removed, the link shall be removed before unlink() returns, but >the removal of the file contents shall be postponed until all references >to the file are closed. AIUI, Windows NT had a design goal of allowing a complient implementation of POSIX to be implmented in a subsystem (along with userespace utilities). (Hence services for unix). Could we at least simulate the behavior by moving the file out of the way (simultaionsly renaming it to something unique), and forcing it into the delqueue? (by Setting the FILE_DISPOSITION_INFORMATION's DeleteFile flag to true?) Wait a moment, that looks to be exactly what unlink_nt is doing? What is going on? (The problem is with a call in Python3k getting a "Permission denied" (ERRNO 13) error when attempting to create a file shortly after it has been deleted with unlink. That seems to be consistant with standard windows behavior for deleting a file, as trying to create it again before the last handle is closed would return an ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED.) However, it looks like with unlink_nt that should not be happening, right? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/