X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:20:12 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: failed to build from source Message-ID: <20070728022012.GA4911@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:10:52PM -0600, Morgan gangwere wrote: > uhm... if im not mistaken, this list is for the support of: > 1) the usge of cygwin1.dll (for use in porting apps to cygwin for later > introduction into the source trees) > 2) the installation of cygwin (meaning from setup.exe) > 3) the general mongering of cygwin relating to the KERNEL not APPS (app > support should go to the maintainer of that package) > (i may be wrong) but shouldnt this be taken to cygwin-dev? Developers like Brian Dessent know what they are talking about and know when and where to redirect threads. You don't have to worry about things like that. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/