X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Thorsten Kampe <thorsten AT thorstenkampe DOT de>
Subject:  Re: Using RSH on Windows 2003 server?
Date:  Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:13:04 +0100
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <f8ah6h$4ni$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <7E9C5D9E5FB9BE4A8616D0AEC0E8FD690CC4C6 AT CORPUSMX60B DOT corp DOT emc DOT com>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.70.2067
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

*  (Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:05:17 -0400)
> I'm trying to rsh into a computer that is running Windows 2003 server,
> but I get the error "No Remote Directory."  I can, however, ftp and
> telnet into that same box, and when I ping it, the test comes back as
> successful.  Anyone have any ideas?

 <broken record>
  rsh is an inherently unsecure protocol.  Don't use it.  Don't use
  the excuse that this is on a local corporate network only.  You
  have no idea who's sniffing on your network.  Better use a secure
  protocol instead, like ssh.  All services provided by the OBSOLETE
  rsh/rlogin/telnet interfaces are provided in a much more secure
  way by ssh.
  </broken record>


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/