X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-YMail-OSG: 5pIKrZYVM1n6HmD34bAwyvjruw_Hcek73LaW8.P2RrqMIOnpR_ZJVbTg7Zr.BK5l2OvB5mPxQQ--
Message-ID: <46A8A7DB.3000100@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:55:39 -0700
From: Tim Prince <n8tm AT aol DOT com>
Reply-To: tprince AT computer DOT org
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin Perl and -Duselongdouble
References: <B762313E2F744EE8A72B2113F081D0D3 AT desktop2> <46A8939C DOT 340DF017 AT dessent DOT net> <11CF7C4D0D334F4EBC16B015D7CB1993 AT desktop2>
In-Reply-To: <11CF7C4D0D334F4EBC16B015D7CB1993@desktop2>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

sisyphus1 AT optusnet DOT com DOT au wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Dessent" <brian AT dessent DOT net>
> To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 10:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Cygwin Perl and -Duselongdouble

> Oh ... it's probably just ignorance on my part.
> If I can successfully run 'gcc script.c' (where 'script.c' contains a 
> call to 'sqrtl') then I'm inclined to say that sqrtl is "available in 
> the C compiler" (or something like that).
If your position is that availability as a built-in should suffice, you 
may have a long row to hoe.
> 
> I gather from your response (and Corinna's) that there are also a couple 
> of things called 'newlib' and 'libc' that enter into the equation.
gcc itself supports only built-in functions.  There are plenty of posts 
in the archives concerning why cygwin doesn't use glibc rather than newlib.
> 
> I find it all quite confusing. My MinGW version of math.h specifically 
> prototypes the "long double" version of a number of functions (ceill, 
> floorl, sqrtl, modfl, ...), yet I can't find any mention of those 
> functions in any of the gcc headers on Linux or Cygwin.
mingw relies on Microsoft library support, where again there is no 
separate long double.  You are free to add prototypes to your cygwin 
<math.h>, but you must take the further step of actually supplying a 
function.  It should not be difficult to make one for cygwin which 
satisfies your purposes, whatever they are.  For example, you could 
build a function which uses the built-in, with its limitations.
> 
/definitely Off Topic
> If I call sqrtl on linux I have to link to -lm, on Cygwin I don't.

Most compilers on linux also have a built-in sqrtl.  If you set the 
right options in gcc, for example, you should be able to make a simple 
test which gets by with that.  You may have to check for bugs in 
mathinline.h.  Many distros do ugly things which can't be blamed on gcc 
or glibc maintainers.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/