Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:23:09 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: hacked package on server
Message-ID: <20070716232309.GB5054@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <12471618 DOT 1184601552985 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT elwamui-lapwing DOT atl DOT sa DOT earthlink DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0707161448430 DOT 18589 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> <183c528b0707161244s83639c9j8ddfb09da2948f29 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20070716211443 DOT GB4858 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <7FE216529E1FE248A760B58F6B82A81002094EA1 AT EMMA DOT personal DOT adp DOT ltu DOT se> <469BFD33 DOT 7000504 AT portugalmail DOT pt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <469BFD33.7000504@portugalmail.pt>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:20:19AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>The second best, and quickest, would be for a patch to show up
>implementing Thorsten's suggestion that cfg pointed out.  Until someone
>steps up to do the work, this discussion is just going to fade out and
>die.

Urp.  How could I have missed the opportunity to point something like
that out?

I must be slipping.

Of course, I would hate to trade what I consider to be a perfectly
understandable message for another understandable message if this is
really a non-issue.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/