X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: RE: hacked package on server
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:47:50 +0200
Message-ID: <7FE216529E1FE248A760B58F6B82A81002094EA1@EMMA.personal.adp.ltu.se>
In-Reply-To: <20070716211443.GB4858@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
References: <12471618 DOT 1184601552985 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT elwamui-lapwing DOT atl DOT sa DOT earthlink DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0707161448430 DOT 18589 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> <183c528b0707161244s83639c9j8ddfb09da2948f29 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20070716211443 DOT GB4858 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
From: "Bengt-Arne Fjellner" <bengt-arne DOT fjellner AT ltu DOT se>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id l6GMm1uM025546

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 03:44:51PM -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
>> Yes, everyone now has been quite hilarious on this part of the
>> matter, but I think it's time to get past the arrogance and, god
>> forbid, consider that a user's reported problem, oh my god, might
>> actually be a problem!
> 
> You did receive one response with a suggestion:
> 
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-07/msg00396.html
> 
> I don't see how it's productive for you to assume humor-as-arrogance
> and respond to that but avoid responding to the suggestion.
> 
>> Any time there's a report of a user having a problem with an
>> interface, *especially* one that's _supposedly_ so easy and obvious,
>> why not address it?  Or why not AT LEAST take a thought and say to
>> yourself, "if something is supposed to be so simple and obvious, and
>> yet someone is having a problem with it, maybe *I* am making an
>> assumption about the simplicity of it?"
> 
> Ok.  I'll bite.  Has anyone done a google search to see if anyone else
> was confused by this message?  The message seems pretty clear to me
> and not something that I would misinterpret.  It doesn't seem like
> this is something that anyone should take a lot of time fixing if
> we've only gotten one complaint.  OTOH, if more people have been
> confused by the message then possibly it is something worth changing.
> 
> cgf

Well in my opinion It could even be better to have an unchecked checkbox
like:

Wrong MD5 sum detected.
This package look broken. Try another mirror.
( ) Yes I Really want to install this even if it looks broken.

OK

Or something like that. Then its two clicks or several keystrokes before
one can continue.



-- 
tel 0920 49 1894
Bengt-Arne Fjellner

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/