X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Thorsten Kampe Subject: Re: hacked package on server Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:04:16 +0100 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <469B9A27 DOT 3090406 AT cs DOT wisc DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.70.2067 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com * Louis Kruger (Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:17:43 -0500) > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 10:30:52AM -0500, Louis Kruger wrote: > > > I also have a complaint: the dialog that notifies the user of the failed > > > MD5 is not well designed. The dialog asks "Do you want to skip the > > > package?" and has a yes and no button. I read it quickly and pressed no > > > before thinking about it, the package went ahead and tried to install. I > > > think there should be a little more effort to restrain the user from > > > performing a dangerous action such as installing a package with a wrong MD5. > > > > Good point. The message should probably be > > > > Do you want to not skip the package (No/Yes)? > > I realize you are joking, but the wording of the message is beside the > point. That's a valid point as "skipping" already contains a negation meaning "not installing". Something like "Do you still want to install the package (although it might have been tampered with)? If unsure choose "No". [Yes/No]" - with a default of "No" would make definitely more sense. Thorsten -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/