X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <4686950F DOT E3D9ED56 AT dessent DOT net> Subject: RE: Starting some notes on large paths... what's the right place?(Re: large paths in cygwin.) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:35:19 +0100 Message-ID: <00c901c7c342$983ed160$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 10 July 2007 23:25, Robert North wrote: > Ideally I'd like to place this kind of thing in a cygwin wiki, > but as Cygwin doesn't have one, my preference is to place the notes in > this mailing list, where they will be searchable. > Is this a good idea? > Is there a better place to put them? > --such as the developer's list? Perhaps the best place of all to put them would be to write them in the form of text file which we could add to cygwin cvs as how-paths.txt along the lines of the various other how-* docs files: http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/winsup/cygwin/?cvsroot=src#how-autolo ad-works.txt However that would most likely require you to complete a copyright assignment form for redhat (and get a disclaimer from your employer if they might claim rights over your work). Dumping it to the mailing list is indeed a reasonable way to get it archived and searchable. Developers list is probably more appropriate than this one - it's not likely to be terribly interesting to most of the audience here! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/