X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <3058f9b40707091122o5ab30b8ci717c93bedf537796@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:22:20 +0200
From: "Ariel Burbaickij" <ariel DOT burbaickij AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: status of utf-8 patch
In-Reply-To: <46927899.60609@cygwin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3058f9b40707090419w3b475aa1j74396a5dad5aacd9 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <46921D75 DOT 29CE8798 AT dessent DOT net> <f6tn6v$rpu$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> 	 <46927899 DOT 60609 AT cygwin DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Have you some outlines of this something given WIn 9x support can be
dropped, indeed?

On 7/9/07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> Matt Seitz wrote:
> > "Brian Dessent" <brian AT dessent DOT net> wrote in message
> > news:46921D75 DOT 29CE8798 AT dessent DOT net...
> >> Ariel Burbaickij wrote:
> >>
> >>> question: what is  the status of utf-8 patch fo cygwin? Is it
> >> You can find all the details in the mailing list archives.
> >> <http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2006-q3/msg00014.html>
> >>
> >>> endorsed/supported?
> >> It was submitted and rejected on technical grounds, which means sadly
> >> it's not supported here.
> >
> > The explanation I saw for the rejection was "...it should just be a
> > wholesale replacement, not a bunch of wrappers around existing functions."
> >
> > It's now a year later.  Is there an expectation that the "wholesale
> > replacement" or another solution is coming soon?  What would be the harm in
> > adopting the current solution for now?  Is this a case of "the perfect is
> > the enemy of the good"?
>
>
> No.  It's more like the "the limited hack is the enemy of future progress".
> It should be _a_little_ easier to implement something maintainable with
> 1.7 code (in CVS), since Win9x support is no longer a requirement.
>
> --
> Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
> RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
> 216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
> Holliston, MA 01746
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
>
> A: Yes.
>  > Q: Are you sure?
>  >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>  >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/