X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <468E361B.8070608@byu.net> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:31:23 -0600 From: Eric Blake User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070509 Thunderbird/1.5.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Interference between instances on MS-Windows References: <014601c7bf14$4ba90e10$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <014f01c7bf1b$b352aab0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <015d01c7bf21$be3d41a0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> In-Reply-To: <015d01c7bf21$be3d41a0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Dave Korn on 7/5/2007 10:30 AM: >> Sending a copy of it to one support tech to >> debug that vendor's library does not constitute distribution, AFAICT. > > Utterly comprehensively wrong. Sorry. > > The only thing that "does not constitute distribution" is giving it to other > individuals within your organisation; if I worked for the same firm as you, > you could give me a binary without that conferring gpl rights on me, because > basically it counts as keeping it private. Although in GPLv3, there is a new clause in section 2 that does not have a corresponding analogue in GPLv2: "You may convey covered works to others for the sole purpose of having them make modifications exclusively for you, or provide you with facilities for running those works, provided that you comply with the terms of this License in conveying all material for which you do not control copyright. Those thus making or running the covered works for you must do so exclusively on your behalf, under your direction and control, on terms that prohibit them from making any copies of your copyrighted material outside their relationship with you." IANAL, but perhaps you can use this to your advantage, by relicensing your program under GPL3, before sending a copy to someone off-list willing to debug it under your terms. But certainly bring that up with a lawyer before getting yourself into trouble (as I disclaim any bad results that come if you violate the GPL as a result of reading this email). Oh, and I'm not willing to be the off-list recipient to do your debug work. - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake ebb9 AT byu DOT net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGjjYb84KuGfSFAYARAg/jAJ4h/F0iiTfCYJ2Efi/JiB/uw/0BLACaApiO jMWC/qe/zPlyV6Ge/NhucpY= =XnZn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/