X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <ba40711f0707042054h24087b71mbac7ae2d6649c925@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:54:32 -0400
From: "Lev Bishop" <lev DOT bishop AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New package: brltty 3.8
In-Reply-To: <20070703130416.GD3701@implementation.labri.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20070606192615 DOT GG22248 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> 	 <2D9E96311DCA4C48BF185EA6928BC7BB01E1BD3E AT asc-mail DOT int DOT ascribe DOT com> 	 <20070607115925 DOT GC3958 AT implementation> 	 <20070702233210 DOT GD3759 AT interface DOT famille DOT thibault DOT fr> 	 <20070703075424 DOT GI30973 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> 	 <20070703130416 DOT GD3701 AT implementation DOT labri DOT fr>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id l653sk31001841

On 7/3/07, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen, le Tue 03 Jul 2007 09:54:24 +0200, a écrit :
> > For using local named pipes you don't need winsock anyway, and for
> > remote connections you should use Cygwin sockets.
>
> And mixing both is quite difficult.  Anyhow, I'll only enable cygwin
> sockets and hope the latency is sufficient for users.

I still feel that if you had latency problems using TCP it was either
a bug in your program, or a bug in your protocol (you are the author
of the protocol, right?), or a bug in cygwin. Is there a way I can
investigate this without needing special braille hardware (like, is
there some kind of "dummy" driver that sends the braille to the
console or something). Or, do you have a simplified testcase that
exhibits this latency you are concerned about?

Lev

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/