X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:08:52 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Multithreaded accept/connect locks Message-ID: <20070627170852.GO7379@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <368730366a00 DOT 366a00368730 AT drexel DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <368730366a00.366a00368730@drexel.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jun 26 16:39, wtk25 AT drexel DOT edu wrote: > I'm trying to test some socket code inside a single process. I have two threads, a server and a client, and try to connect a Unix domain socket between them, but the threads block on accept() and connect() respectively. I've tried blocking on select() so that the accept() does not block, with the same results. When the server and client are forked into different processes, the connection works fine. > > This problem seems similar to that reported in > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2003-02/msg00064.html > except that my sockets are Unix domain, so my connecting socket should be looking in the right place. > However, that thread is pretty old, and I'm running a more recent version of Cygwin. No, that's unrelated. > The problem is also possibly related to > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.ithreads/2007/01/msg1142.html > Although I don't know any perl, so maybe not. Yes, that's the same problem. From stracing the problem it appears that the underlying problem is in WinSock. connect returns with an error 10036, WSAEINPROGRESS, because the other thread is at that time executing a blocking socket call (accept). The problem is aggravated by the fact that the connect call in Cygwin is always using non-blocking mode and WSAEINPROGRESS is also referring to a connect which is still in progress and needs further handling. In CVS, the Cygwin socket code has been reworked a lot. One important change is that besides recv/send/connect also accept is now implemented in non-blocking mode under the hood. This has the effect that the connect call should't be able to fail due to a blocking accept in the same process. If you try your application against a recent snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/, your test application will run as expected. However, if you want the application to work with 1.5.24 as well, you should consider to implement accept in non-blocking mode manually in your application. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/