X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <46817A1E.ADB2C1C4@dessent.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:42:06 -0700 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: GCC 4.1.1 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com "Frederich, Eric P21322" wrote: > I'm trying to get gcc on Cygwin to the same version that I use on Linux > and Solaris (4.1.1). > There is no "need" for this, but it would be nice to have all platforms > I'm trying to support on the same version. I'm really not sure why you're doing this, and especially why if you're going to use a 4.x release you're using sucn an old one. If anything, I'd use the 4.3 branch, since it contains a lot of things relevant to Cygwin like a modern libtool. Anyway, the 3.4 packaged version of gcc has a number of local fixes that aren't upstream, so if you want a stable compiler then you should use this one, not a FSF release. You should know what these issues are and if they matter to you before using a version of gcc built yourself. If gcc4 was stable on Cygwin there would be packages for it, it's not just a matter of nobody having time to build them. With that out of the way, it's possible to get -mno-cygwin working with gcc4 just fine, it shouldn't take any patches. You'll of course have to build gcc again as the MinGW version, and set up some symlinks. See the postinstall of the gcc package for details. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/