X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:41:45 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: no vi editor?? Message-ID: <20070622174145.GA16977@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1182469846 DOT 20350 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <467B3A25 DOT 6020706 AT advancedsl DOT com DOT ar> <31b7d2790706220859g4b6ec2a5k6cdb70fdba7441dc AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <071701c7b4eb$83a48520$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 09:46:15AM -0700, KAYVEN RIESE wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Dave Korn wrote: > >> On 22 June 2007 17:33, KAYVEN RIESE wrote: >> >>> kayve AT kayve-PC ~ >>> $ vi test >>> bash: vi: command not found >>> >>> kayve AT kayve-PC ~ >>> $ >>> aww man, u gotta be kidding!!! >> >> >> No, we don't gotta! See "2.8. What packages should I download? Where are >> 'make', 'gcc', 'vi', etc? " at >> http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.what-packages >> > > but why? why wouldn't it be default?? {:( Because we don't like you and don't want you to be happy? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/