Message-ID: <4672BAA4.80203@bonhard.uklinux.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:13:24 +0100
From: fergus <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cygwin ML <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
CC: fergus <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
Subject: Re: Batch installation, possibly without setup.exe?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

 > I'm not sure why 'setup.exe' would take significantly longer to
 > install than a copy when it comes to putting it on a USB drive
 > (never tried it).
 > Obviously, you'd skip the download part and install from a
 > previously downloaded local directory of packages (that got created
 > when you installed Cygwin on the source machine).

Yes, the time taken isn't in the downloading but in the writing to the 
USB device. I think this is a feature of Windows' management of the 
activity, however it's contrived (whether setup or copy or unzip). I 
wrote to the flash drive manufacturer with a sheaf of time stats, 
moaning about the geological duration of minor tasks. They replied, 
That's normal.

On the other hand, if (as I intended to make clear but didn't) you 
devolve the task to Linux with

     cp -vr /host /target # or equivalent

then the whole thing absolutely flies along, the blue light flashing on 
the target device like a cop car, and the file audit screaming up the 
screen too fast even to count the pages. I reckon 160,000 files / 3.6G 
in less than an hour (I've got a lot under /home/). Quite what holds 
Windows up, I can't think. It would be easier to hew the files out of 
granite.

Fergus


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/