X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4672BAA4.80203@bonhard.uklinux.net> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:13:24 +0100 From: fergus User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin ML CC: fergus Subject: Re: Batch installation, possibly without setup.exe? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > I'm not sure why 'setup.exe' would take significantly longer to > install than a copy when it comes to putting it on a USB drive > (never tried it). > Obviously, you'd skip the download part and install from a > previously downloaded local directory of packages (that got created > when you installed Cygwin on the source machine). Yes, the time taken isn't in the downloading but in the writing to the USB device. I think this is a feature of Windows' management of the activity, however it's contrived (whether setup or copy or unzip). I wrote to the flash drive manufacturer with a sheaf of time stats, moaning about the geological duration of minor tasks. They replied, That's normal. On the other hand, if (as I intended to make clear but didn't) you devolve the task to Linux with cp -vr /host /target # or equivalent then the whole thing absolutely flies along, the blue light flashing on the target device like a cop car, and the file audit screaming up the screen too fast even to count the pages. I reckon 160,000 files / 3.6G in less than an hour (I've got a lot under /home/). Quite what holds Windows up, I can't think. It would be easier to hew the files out of granite. Fergus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/