X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <46716034.7080904@computing.dundee.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:35:16 +0100 From: Chris McClements User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin allocted time slice References: <017001c7ae32$49dff3c0$0600a8c0 AT ze4427wm> <20070614034243 DOT GA15091 AT ednor DOT casa1 DOT cgf DOT cx> <006a01c7ae97$7c225cf0$0600a8c0 AT ze4427wm> In-Reply-To: <006a01c7ae97$7c225cf0$0600a8c0@ze4427wm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DD-AC-MailScanner-Information: Contact NickDawes AT computing DOT dundee DOT ac DOT uk for more information X-DD-AC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DD-AC-MailScanner-From: cmcclements AT computing DOT dundee DOT ac DOT uk X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Aaron Gray wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:15:40AM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> Cygwin seems to only use a small amount of time slice relative to the >>> ammount of time slice availiable. Compiles, builds and testsuite are >>> relly slow compared to MinGW which takes too much time. >>> >>> 'time' results confirm this. Process time is about 1/4 of the total >>> system time. >>> >>> It i very noticable on compiling and testing GCC as compared to the >>> same on Linux or MinGW. >>> >>> Is there any way to give Cygwin a bigger slice of the pie ? >>> >>> Say 50% or 75% ? Process scheduling is an operating system task. >> >> How do you suppose Cygwin is managing this interesting feat of only >> using some of the CPU time? What Windows API is Cygwin using to just >> grab a small slice of the time? > > Weird I was getting very long compile times for GCC and on using 'time' > was getting indications that make was only getting 25% of total system > time. > File IO? > I'll see if it is repeatable on another system. > >> As a follow-up question: Why do you suppose we are punishing you by >> not allowing Cygwin to use all of the CPU by default? >> >> Oh. Wait. WJM. Nevermind. > > Weird reply, no need to take the micky ! Hes trying to tell you you've got the wrong idea. Why try to assert things about time slices when you clearly are not sure about what is going on? > > Aaron > > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/