X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <466D9873.6050406@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:46:11 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070505 Remi/2.0.0.0-3.fc4.remi Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com . Reformatted. Brian Dantes wrote: >> From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" cygwincom> >> Reply-To: cygwincom> >> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:36:09 -0400 >> To: cygwincom> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ . Don't feed the spammmers. Thanks. >> Subject: Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils >> >> On 06/11/2007, Brian Dantes wrote: >>> As an aside, is object code and libraries generated by MinGW gcc/g++ 3.4.2 >>> (the latest stable release, I believe) fully compatible with Cygwin's >>> gcc/g++ 3.4.4 code generated in -mno-cygwin? >> You mean object code-wise? Yes. Cygwin is building Win32 executables, just >> like MinGW. > More specifically, can object code generated by Cygwin g++ 3.4.4 be linked > with MinGW gcc 3.4.2 libraries and vice versa? For example, I know this is > *not* true for MinGW g++ 3.2.1; libstdc++ changed significantly between > g++ 3.2.1 and 3.4.4. g++ is binary compatible within the 3.4 series. I believe this has been true with each of the 3.x series. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/