X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <466D9873.6050406@cygwin.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:46:11 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070505 Remi/2.0.0.0-3.fc4.remi Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils
References: <C292DA05.6B2A%bldantes AT comcast DOT net>
In-Reply-To: <C292DA05.6B2A%bldantes@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU>.  Reformatted.

Brian Dantes wrote:
>> From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh<AT>cygwin<DOT>com>
>> Reply-To: <cygwin<AT>cygwin<DOT>com>
>> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:36:09 -0400
>> To: <cygwin<AT>cygwin<DOT>com>
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>.  Don't feed the spammmers.
Thanks.

>> Subject: Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils
>>
>> On 06/11/2007, Brian Dantes wrote:
>>> As an aside, is object code and libraries generated by MinGW gcc/g++ 3.4.2
>>> (the latest stable release, I believe) fully compatible with Cygwin's
>>> gcc/g++ 3.4.4 code generated in -mno-cygwin?
>> You mean object code-wise?  Yes.  Cygwin is building Win32 executables, just
>> like MinGW.
 > More specifically, can object code generated by Cygwin g++ 3.4.4 be linked
 > with MinGW gcc 3.4.2 libraries and vice versa? For example, I know this is
 > *not* true for MinGW g++ 3.2.1; libstdc++ changed significantly between
 > g++ 3.2.1 and 3.4.4.

g++ is binary compatible within the 3.4 series.  I believe this has been
true with each of the 3.x series.


-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/