X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:52:53 -0700 Subject: Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils From: Brian Dantes <bldantes AT comcast DOT net> To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> Message-ID: <C292DA05.6B2A%bldantes@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <466D8809.6030003@cygwin.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com More specifically, can object code generated by Cygwin g++ 3.4.4 be linked with MinGW gcc 3.4.2 libraries and vice versa? For example, I know this is *not* true for MinGW g++ 3.2.1; libstdc++ changed significantly between g++ 3.2.1 and 3.4.4. Brian > From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com> > Reply-To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> > Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:36:09 -0400 > To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> > Subject: Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils > > On 06/11/2007, Brian Dantes wrote: >> As an aside, is object code and libraries generated by MinGW gcc/g++ 3.4.2 >> (the latest stable release, I believe) fully compatible with Cygwin's >> gcc/g++ 3.4.4 code generated in -mno-cygwin? > > You mean object code-wise? Yes. Cygwin is building Win32 executables, just > like MinGW. > > -- > Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com > RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office > 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX > Holliston, MA 01746 > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > A: Yes. >> Q: Are you sure? >>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/