X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 23:05:19 +0800 From: Samuel Thibault To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New package: brltty 3.8 Message-ID: <20070608150519.GN4943@implementation> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20070607160859 DOT GA3577 AT implementation> <20070607163744 DOT GA4972 AT ednor DOT casa1 DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070607164933 DOT GF4110 AT implementation> <20070607174554 DOT GH4110 AT implementation> <20070607184619 DOT GA14598 AT implementation> <20070607190146 DOT GA5235 AT ednor DOT casa1 DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070608075720 DOT GA4943 AT implementation> <20070608144249 DOT GB26855 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20070608144249.GB26855@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor, le Fri 08 Jun 2007 10:42:49 -0400, a écrit : > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:57:20PM +0800, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Christopher Faylor, le Thu 07 Jun 2007 15:01:46 -0400, a ?crit : > >>What about unix domain sockets in cygwin? It sounds like you think > >>they aren't available. > > > >As I already said several times, it must work with non-cygwin > >applications as well. > > A unix domain socket used on stdin/stdout works with non-cygwin > applications. > > It would really help if you provided an actual use case which > demonstrated what you are talking about. I'm a bit tired to re-explain all of this, I've already had to do it on other lists, it's really boring to go along all these arguments just once more... But since you really want some details, here are more: Brltty acts as a "braille display server": when an application not only wants to display their usual GUI, but also braille, it can connect to brltty for rendering braille (by sending "write" commands, and receiving "keypress" events). Thus stdin/stdout can't work since applications may want to keep their text GUI as it is and the initiative of establishing the connexion comes from the application anyway, not brltty. > Otherwise, you seem to be asking that we just trust you that brltty is > different from most other packages in the distribution and deserves > special dispensation. I'm not asking so big special dispensation. Why should cygwin applications be forced to use cygwin sockets? Samuel -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/