X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 15:03:02 -0400 From: "Lev Bishop" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New package: brltty 3.8 In-Reply-To: <20070607184619.GA14598@implementation> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070606192445 DOT GG6500 AT implementation> <20070607114950 DOT GA3958 AT implementation> <20070607122642 DOT GA31803 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070607160859 DOT GA3577 AT implementation> <20070607163744 DOT GA4972 AT ednor DOT casa1 DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070607164933 DOT GF4110 AT implementation> <20070607174554 DOT GH4110 AT implementation> <20070607184619 DOT GA14598 AT implementation> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id l57J3OV4013851 On 6/7/07, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Lev Bishop, le Thu 07 Jun 2007 14:39:17 -0400, a écrit : > > ...about 2ms round-trip. How is this a problem? > > This adds up to the screen reader latency, etc. > > Really, we tried both, and while tcp/ip was a bit painful, local sockets > were smooth. Sorry, but I don't believe that anybody, blind or not, can perceive a 2ms lag. If it seemed painful using tcp/ip then it must have been due to some other reason than latency. Lev -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/