X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 00:08:59 +0800 From: Samuel Thibault To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New package: brltty 3.8 Message-ID: <20070607160859.GA3577@implementation> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4666819A DOT 52A6488D AT dessent DOT net> <20070606102654 DOT GA11636 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20070606085100 DOT GA5082 AT implementation> <4666819A DOT 52A6488D AT dessent DOT net> <20070606192445 DOT GG6500 AT implementation> <20070606201111 DOT GA2366 AT ednor DOT casa1 DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070607114950 DOT GA3958 AT implementation> <20070607122642 DOT GA31803 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20070607141752.GB4644@ednor.casa1.cgf.cx> <20070607122642.GA31803@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor, le Thu 07 Jun 2007 08:26:42 -0400, a écrit : > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 07:49:50PM +0800, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Christopher Faylor, le Wed 06 Jun 2007 16:11:11 -0400, a ?crit : > >> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:24:45AM +0800, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> >Brian Dessent, le Wed 06 Jun 2007 02:42:50 -0700, a ?crit : > >> >> Yes, setup automatically selects everything in Base for installation, > >> > > >> >Ah, I didn't know that, is that documented somewhere?? > >> > >> Yes: http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/setup-net.html > > > >Mmm, maybe a short note in http://cygwin.com/setup.html would be useful? > > PTC. As usual... Of course I won't provide a _patch_, but the following should be sufficient under the list of categories: « Be careful about the Base category, as its packages are always installed by setup.exe. » > You're just restating things as if everyone knows what you're talking > about. Because you didn't tell me what you didn't understand. Apparently the problem lies in the "windows pipe" expression, to which I forgot to add "named". Just to be (hopefully) clear, since you seem to want all the details: there exist an accessibility protocol called brlapi that uses TCP/IP or "local pipes" for having applications (not only cygwin, but also windows native applications) cooperate. TCP/IP is for inter-machine communication, "local pipes" for faster intra-machine communications. On Unix, local sockets are used. On windows, windows named pipes are used. To the best of my knowledge, there is no "unixish" way in cygwin to access these pipes, so we just used CreateNamedPipe(). As a result, we have a windows handle to deal with. If we used the cygwin sockets for the TCP/IP connextions, we would end up with two types of sockets, which is hairy to handle. Yes, we could use open_osfhandle() for converting the named pipe socket into a cygwin socket, but we still have to manage the windows connexion stuff, etc. Anyway, we already have the code using windows TCP/IP sockets and named pipes working correctly for the mingw32 port, and it _does_ work fine with cygwin too, so for maintainability reasons, it is useless to make the code more complex just for using cygwin functions. > You're now mentioning named pipes which adds another data point but if > brltty is working on linux then I don't see why it can't be using > linux-like techniques on cygwin, cygwin bugs notwithstanding. Because it has to communicate with other, non-cygwin, applications > You don't appear to be saying that you've stumbled over a cygwin bug. I'm not (except maybe "cygwin doesn't provide a way to connect to windows named pipes). > Instead you just keep saying that it's hard to mix windows and cygwin > things. Well, duh. Just don't use the Windows things. I need to connect to windows named pipes. > >> Unless there is good reason, the cygwin distribution really is > >> supposed to be comprised of programs which use the linux API. > > > >But when talking about communicating with other applications, we need to > >use windows interfaces when the linux API doesn't permit it, shouldn't > >we? > > Only if you can clearly communicate why the linux API doesn't work. I already said it in a previous mail: because it has to communicate with other, non-cygwin, applications. Samuel -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/