Message-Id: <200706071601.l57G1K7M023092@delorie.com> X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Olivier Langlois" To: Subject: RE: cygwin1.dll building question Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:00:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20070607133754.GA4519@ednor.casa1.cgf.cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi cgf, > You must be referring to newlib if you are talking about Makefile.am. > newlib has its own mailing list newlib at sourceware PERIOD org . > You'll need to talk to the maintainer of newlib if you are adding a new > function there. I have contacted the newlib maintainer about the patch, thanks for the contact point. I have some legal issues with the licensing to work with cygwin but once its done, will I have to offer a patch to cygwin.din file or someone from cygwin will take care of it? > > >4-My generated libcygwin.a is 3.6MB vs 953KB for the one distributed with > >the cygwin binaries. Obviously, I did not build the same thing. Does > someone > >have an idea about what would explain that difference? > > The standard answer: debugging symbols. It makes sense. How do I generate the lib without the debug symbols then? Thank you very much for the explanations cgf! Greetings, Olivier Langlois -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/