X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:44:47 -0400 From: "Pierre A. Humblet" Subject: Re: cron functionality regression? To: , Message-id: <064a01c7a873$24915c40$c30010ac@wirelessworld.airvananet.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 32 DOT 20070424224040 DOT 00b99ff8 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net> <4666B8C0 DOT 9030500 AT Gymel DOT com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Berger" To: "The Cygwin Mailing List" Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:38 AM Subject: cron functionality regression? | Hello, | | From http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2007-04/msg00319.html : | | > The changes (listed in /usr/share/doc/cron/CHANGES) don't appear to break | > compatibility with 3.0. | | this seems to be a version of vixie cron which (contrary to the | previous one) consistently (e.g. also in the manpage) does not (yet?, | any more?) support crontabs in /etc/cron.d . Yep, looks like it's gone (there is no real changelog), no idea why (except that /etc/cron.d is not in POSIX ). Is this regression a real problem for you (i.e. no quick workaround) or for others? If so I could try to cut & paste it back from 3.0, or use another cron (which one?). In general I prefer not modifying "standard" packages. Pierre -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/