X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 23:59:42 -0400 From: yitzle To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: scripting and cygwin In-Reply-To: <465F9792.90100@earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <465F7608 DOT 30504 AT earthlink DOT net> <465F8F6B DOT 8010209 AT earthlink DOT net> <20070601032235 DOT GA10837 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <465F93EE DOT 7050809 AT earthlink DOT net> <465F96B0 DOT 1050904 AT earthlink DOT net> <465F9792 DOT 90100 AT earthlink DOT net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4e9587911f523488 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com I fail to follow the logic behind that statement. You suggested that "those with IQ less than 80 have responded so far..." I noted that by your own reply, you are implying that you believe your IQ to be below 80. Your reply 1) is agreeing with what I said ("yes, ..."), yet it seems to be agreeing with something other than what I said. PS There ought to be a comma between "yes" and "you". On 5/31/07, John wrote: > yes you are stupid. > > yitzle wrote: > > On 5/31/07, John wrote: > >> hee hee, > >> > >> those with IQ less than 80 have responded so far... > >> on and on it goes... > >> > >> :-) > >> > > > > Rather self damming reply, don't you think? > > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/