X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <465F16EA.1040007@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:41:46 -0700
From: Tom <fivemiletom AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc 4.x?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

There is an email thread from 2006 to this topic:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-03/msg00507.html

I have compiled my own GCC 4.2.0 for cygwin, but not tested and not 
really used it a lot. And I must admit that what Charles et al were 
talking about is not my core expertise.

I would appreciate any status update on 4.x, too.


Brian Hassink wrote:
 > Just curious what the issues are that are holding up [..]

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/