X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <465CE9DE.4030907@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 22:05:02 -0500 From: "B. K. Oxley (binkley)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: more on Re: bash process substitution "<(list)" [spot the difference] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com I am exploring how process substitution works on Cygwin. I have scripts which run fine on Linux but not on Windows XP. Why does one of these scripts produce an error and the other does not? Script #1: $ cat a #!/bin/bash function f() { echo "$1" cat "$1" } f <(echo OK) $ ./a /proc/self/fd/63 OK Script #2: $ cat b #!/bin/bash function f() { ls -l "$1" cat "$1" } f <(echo OK) $ ./b lrwxrwxrwx 1 luser None 0 May 29 15:49 /proc/self/fd/63 -> pipe:[1728] cat: /proc/self/fd/63: No such file or directory Thanks, --binkley http://binkley.blogspot.com/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/