X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <465B552F.4060903@tlinx.org> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 15:18:23 -0700 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Processing A Script Too Slow under Cygwin References: <10832118 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <10836107 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> In-Reply-To: <10836107.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com ilak1008 wrote: > In fact, my script process a file about 5 sec under SFU while under Cygwin, > it takes about 30 sec or longer. I wish to continue using Cygwin. > Therefore, is there a better way to make the processing faster without the > need of optimizing my script? ---- Strange. While cygwin may be no speed demon next to native win32 apps, when I last did timing tests between SFU and Cygwin, Cygwin was faster by a few noses (which meant Cygwin was pretty good at what it does given the MS's own unix emulation layer was slower). Must be something in your workload that's putting the brakes on Cygwin. Can you post an example of what you are talking about? In my case, I was timing file-system-wide "find" commands that were looking for files to cleanup (like old core files, tmp files...etc). What are you doing in your script? Perhaps you're hitting some network timeout somewhere? Linda W. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/