X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Thorsten Kampe <thorsten AT thorstenkampe DOT de>
Subject:  Re: Processing A Script Too Slow under Cygwin
Date:  Mon, 28 May 2007 15:56:16 +0100
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <f3eqil$1nv$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <10832118 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <f3e836$47j$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <10836107 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.70.2067
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

* ilak1008 (Mon, 28 May 2007 06:16:33 -0700 (PDT))
> Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> > * ilak1008 (Mon, 28 May 2007 00:17:25 -0700 (PDT))
> >> I tried running a script using both SFU & Cygwin. I noticed that
> >> processing a
> >> script in Cygwin is a lot slower as compared to using SFU.
> > 
> > Yes, about two times slower is reasonable.
> > 
> >> Is there a way to make the processing faster?
> > 
> > Yes, profile and optimise you script.
> > 
> In fact, my script process a file about 5 sec under SFU while under Cygwin,
> it takes about 30 sec or longer.  I wish to continue using Cygwin. 
> Therefore, is there a better way to make the processing faster without the
> need of optimizing my script?  

Not that I'm aware of...

T.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/