X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <10836107.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 06:16:33 -0700 (PDT) From: ilak1008 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Processing A Script Too Slow under Cygwin In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: ilak1008 AT yahoo DOT com References: <10832118 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > * ilak1008 (Mon, 28 May 2007 00:17:25 -0700 (PDT)) >> I tried running a script using both SFU & Cygwin. I noticed that >> processing a >> script in Cygwin is a lot slower as compared to using SFU. > > Yes, about two times slower is reasonable. > >> Is there a way to make the processing faster? > > Yes, profile and optimise you script. > > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > > In fact, my script process a file about 5 sec under SFU while under Cygwin, it takes about 30 sec or longer. I wish to continue using Cygwin. Therefore, is there a better way to make the processing faster without the need of optimizing my script? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Processing-A-Script-Too-Slow-under-Cygwin-tf3826478.html#a10836107 Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/