X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Peter Milne" To: References: <001201c79ea3$4d82bce0$8500a8c0 AT RUSNAK> <4656D47E DOT 5050906 AT byu DOT net> <001201c79f49$b57b3c90$8500a8c0 AT RUSNAK> <46582F2B DOT 2000300 AT byu DOT net> Subject: RE: [Spam?]Re: problem concating (>>) to a large file Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:07:15 +1000 Message-ID: <000001c79f9f$2a59e7a0$8500a8c0@RUSNAK> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <46582F2B.2000300@byu.net> X-X-SpamDetect: : 0.000000 X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 93, in=771, out=0, spam=0 ip=203.56.186.192 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi Eric B is 71.8 Mbytes and and according to ls A (actually data.dat) is: -rw-r--r-- 1 trader None 4540030014 May 26 12:00 data.dat I'm running the latest version of cygwin. I hope you are able to reproduce the problem with dd using this information. Cheers Peter -----Original Message----- From: Eric Blake [mailto:ebb9 AT byu DOT net] Sent: Saturday, 26 May 2007 10:59 PM To: Peter Milne; cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: [Spam?]Re: problem concating (>>) to a large file -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PPIOSPE - redirecting to the list According to Peter Milne on 5/25/2007 9:55 PM: > Hi Eric > > Thanks for responding to my query. > > Brian Dessent also responded. He suggested using the following command: > > dd if=B of=A bs=64k conv=notrunc oflag=append > > but this gave the same result as >>, that is, it stuck the contents of file > B at the front of A rather than at the end. If that happened, it is a different bug, since dd does not go through the stdio library, therefore does not see the bug in stdout being in 32-bit mode instead of 64-bit mode. Exactly how big are a and b? I'd like to try to reproduce this, and observe what strace has to say about it, because I agree with Brian that it should work. > It looks like dd is broken in > this respect in the current version of cygwin. I wonder if dd will come > good in 1.70.0 too? Do you have any idea when 1.70.0 will be released? 1.70.0? Not for many, many more years (after all, the 1.5.x series lasted for several years). :) 1.7.0, on the other hand, might be released this year, once it is ready. But in classic open source mindset, the release will be sooner if you help. - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake ebb9 AT byu DOT net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGWC8r84KuGfSFAYARAqZPAKCbA1hzqmf7tZBwwsgmNf+Q1358SACfT8ze fpNDzc7Zn40vc9I3SkGb08w= =/ilm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/