X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:26:15 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Problems with XPDF on Cygwin with recent snapshots (newlib ?)
Message-ID: <20070525152615.GA32733@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0705251626040 DOT 6068-100000 AT ax0rm1 DOT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0705251626040.6068-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 04:38:22PM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I'll bet that the OP had run rebaseall
>
>Yes! Usually I run 'rebaseall' with snapshots or rebuilt 'cygwin1.dll'
>
>Perhaps, in this case, is there some contra-indications to rebaseall?

No, not at all.  It just means that you have to generate a similar list
of dlls to figure out which DLL contains the problem.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/