X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:38:22 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Angelo Graziosi <Angelo DOT Graziosi AT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Problems with XPDF on Cygwin with recent snapshots (newlib ?)
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0705251626040.6068-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


Christopher Faylor wrote:

> I'll bet that the OP had run rebaseall

Yes! 
Usually I run 'rebaseall' with snapshots or rebuilt 'cygwin1.dll'

Pherhaps, in this case, is there some contra-indications to rebaseall?


> so they would have to go through this exercise themselves


Sorry, but I have not a great experience with debugging, so when I detect
some problems I flag them to the list hoping that someone more expert look
at them.


    Angelo.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/