X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:41:08 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: How to uniformly point to the root of a drive? Message-ID: <20070524124108.GT6003@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20070521041542 DOT GA23520 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070521142944 DOT GC6003 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <004301c79bb6$c8c70db0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20070521152515 DOT GD6003 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20070521164542 DOT GF6003 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20070523165335 DOT GQ6003 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On May 23 19:30, Lev Bishop wrote: > Also, why do you have it so that -s is not just a synonym for -d, and > why doesn't -l force -w? There seems to be no advantage to forcing the > user to specify an additional flag. -s and -l are defined as modifiers, not as standalone options. The -d and -m options are inconsistent to begin with, IMO. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/