X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 21:01:26 -0400 From: "Lev Bishop" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: How to uniformly point to the root of a drive? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070521041542 DOT GA23520 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070521142944 DOT GC6003 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <004301c79bb6$c8c70db0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20070521152515 DOT GD6003 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20070521164542 DOT GF6003 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20070523165335 DOT GQ6003 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 5/23/07, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > Lev Bishop wrote: > > Also, why do you have it so that -s is not just a synonym for -d, and > > why doesn't -l force -w? There seems to be no advantage to forcing the > > user to specify an additional flag. > > ...as I previously noted, '-us' is a reasonable combination of flags, > thus '-ul' is also reasonable. I did suggest that '-l' should /imply/ > '-w' unless '-u' is used. Well, currently it treats -us or -ul or plain -l or plain -s all as errors and gives the usage message. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/