X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:08:14 -0500 From: Brian Ford Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Bob Heckel cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Speed of Cygwin's cp vs. Windows Explorer In-Reply-To: <942b10df0705120623r391f6bdeg7aaf5643901a03b0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <942b10df0705120623r391f6bdeg7aaf5643901a03b0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, 12 May 2007, Bob Heckel wrote: > Why would using Cygwin's cp to copy a large file from one Windows XP > box to another take 30 minutes but take only 10 minutes if I use drag > 'n' drop (via Explorer)? > > I saw mention of speed in other posts but couldn't figure out if there > was a solution - could it be buffer sizes or something configurable? > > I'm in a position of defending the use of Cygwin instead of the manual > Windows way of doing things by those not familiar with Unix. Any > hints would be appreciated. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-12/msg00911.html -- Brian Ford Lead Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained crew... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/