X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:26:54 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Trademark rights and copyright for "Cygwin" and logo. Message-ID: <20070511032654.GA7392@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <17mz0cm9ah DOT fsf AT hod DOT lan DOT m-e-leypold DOT de> <4643CD7D DOT 6080009 AT cygwin DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:13:12AM +0200, ls-cygwin-2006 AT m-e-leypold DOT de wrote: >Nonetheless I continue to be thankful for anybody's input (esp. if I >just missed a plainly visible and well known document on that topic >somewhere). It is unclear to me what kind of insight you expect to get about matters like these which would be definitive enough to actually allow you to distribute a product. If the 75% of the mailing list thinks you're ok do you think that Red Hat will just take that as gospel? If you want to get definitive answers about this, then you should be asking Red Hat, not this mailing list. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/