X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Trademark rights and copyright for "Cygwin" and logo. From: ls-cygwin-2006 AT m-e-leypold DOT de Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 03:35:50 +0200 Message-ID: <17mz0cm9ah.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi All, If I understand it right, Cygwin is trademark of redhat and the Cygwin logo is copyright protected. Some people I know (including me) like to have their software on CD for archiving (to get repeatable results or be able to understand errors in former setups), so I've written a small tool that creates a (minimum) 3 CD-Set (1 binary, 2 source) of Cygwin. Since I already have the tool, I'd like to distribute the CD set at installation parties and trade fairs. Two questions arise naturally: 1. May I use the word / product name on the cover as description / label of the content (probably not)? 2. May I use the logo (probably not, too) on the cover? I've found sentences to the effect that logo and the term "Cygwin" are copyrighted respectively trademarked, but I haven't seen a license that would allow distributors to use those. I might have missed something, so - If somebody knows about a text I've missed, would you please point me to it? - Else whom would I write for more information? BTW, if I can't do (1) that would be especially sad: As I understand it I can distribute binaries and source according to the respective licenses. But I'd also like to give proper credit to the Cygwin project, the more, the better. At the moment I don't want even to pretend that what we distribute / give away is a product of ours: Ours is only the service to download it and fit it on a CD (as I said: Esp. useful for archiving or to install baselines). ( And yes I understand that Cygwin is also a commercial product -- http://www.redhat.com/software/cygwin/. Redhat is welcome to their right and welcome to protecting them if/when they think the necessity arises. That is nothing I want to draw in doubt, just to forestall a discussion in that direction for the moment. I just wouldn't want to label the CD "Footools for Windows" or something to that effect and thus _not_ attribute to the project if the necessity doesn't arise. And it would still be strange if setup came up with the cygwin banner :-). Regards -- Markus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/