X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:07:20 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: DualCores and Current Cygwin problems Message-ID: <20070509140720.GA5942@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4641B9B6 DOT 6090204 AT cygwin DOT com> <730141 DOT 8029 DOT qm AT web60713 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <730141.8029.qm@web60713.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:54:36PM +0800, Chee Kiang Goh wrote: >Looking forward nevertheless to a better co-existence solution with >WindowXP/DualCoreCPU. This feature had been the primary reason why I >stick to cygwin over the years :> FYI, there is no better coexistence solution contemplated. PTC, although, you have to wonder why we'd have to accommodate virus checkers or firewalls, which are supposed to be unobtrusive. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/