X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: Andrew Walrond <andrew AT walrond DOT org>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: xemacs -nw  problem
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:54:56 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <200705021455 DOT 18980 DOT andrew AT walrond DOT org> <200705081628 DOT 15639 DOT andrew AT walrond DOT org> <039c01c79186$9cef1d70$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
In-Reply-To: <039c01c79186$9cef1d70$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200705081654.56383.andrew@walrond.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tuesday 08 May 2007 16:36:14 Dave Korn wrote:
>
>   I think you're being a bit over-sensitive there.  Some might consider
> expecting others to do your most basic homework for you unfriendly, but I

Probably and perhaps. In the context of the thread I knew someone could give 
me a two line answer without my having to resort to the UG.

But hey; we've both got bigger fish to fry than this ;)

Andrew Walrond

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/