X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <2b2c01c78fa5$d94a27c0$0200a8c0 AT AMD2500> <01f001c78fc6$c916ce00$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <463DDE7F DOT 5010105 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <022c01c78ff1$545f4ad0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <463DF64F DOT 2080109 AT aol DOT com>
Subject: RE: Successful build of GCC 4.2.0 RC3 on latest Cygwin snapshot 20070427
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 16:44:02 +0100
Message-ID: <022e01c78ff5$5ed734b0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <463DF64F.2080109@aol.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 06 May 2007 16:38, Tim Prince wrote:

> dave DOT korn AT artimi

  PCYM Tim, thanks

>> On 06 May 2007 14:56, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> 
>>> [removed mailing lists other than cygwin]
>>> 
>>> Dave Korn wrote:
> 
>>> So don't anybody here on the cygwin list get too excited yet. <g>
>> 
>>   Didn't actually spot the cygwin list had been cc'd in at first, but yes,
>> I'm just helping test the upstream release, this is not going to turn into
>> a cygwin package in the immediate future.
>> 
> 
> Is it reasonable to assume, then, that gcc 4.3 has as much chance of
> becoming a cygwin package, and put some effort into cleaning that up for
> cygwin?

  All this work has to go in on mainline as a matter of course.  It will then
become part of whichever is the next release branch.  There's next to no
chance of getting consent to back-port what is essentially new functionality
rather than regression fixes.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/