X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:33:05 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request Message-ID: <20070501143305.GF17841@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20070501120623 DOT GA3824 AT tishler DOT net> <20070501133951 DOT GB17841 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <463747BC DOT 3050002 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <04ca01c78bfb$39c7b530$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <04ca01c78bfb$39c7b530$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >On 01 May 2007 14:59, Charles Wilson wrote: >>Because python is a command interpreter, >>Similarly, sh.exe > >I think these are two very strong arguments in favour. python.exe isn't anything like the interactive shell that people use on a day to day basis and simply stating that it is doesn't mean that it is. The only reason that I can see for making a copy would be to support the use of python in a .bat file. Otherwise you could always just do python from the command line. >I note that we already (appear to?) do the same for perl. Ok. I agree that is an argument in favor since I don't recall many complaints about perl. It is a simple copy though, AFAICT. I've registered my objections now and I'll leave the decision to the maintainer. >(/me remembers back to the insane gyrations I had to go through a >couple of years ago when I had to setup makefiles for my clients who >wanted to invoke them from cmd.exe using --win32 and have them work on >systems that could have either cygwin python or active python or both >and they could come in any order in the path.... ) This isn't really relevant to the discussion since the cygwin version of make wouldn't have any problem with symlinks. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/