X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <463096A6.5000700@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:10:14 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070308 Fedora/1.5.0.10-2.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: A Utility that creates .SFV (Simple File Verify) References: <3vm033hr6an9lggppot71p3jaasujmuj11 AT 4ax DOT com> In-Reply-To: <3vm033hr6an9lggppot71p3jaasujmuj11@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com robert_neville310 AT yahoo DOT com wrote: > I would like to develop a script that verifies check sums/crc found in sfv files. > > Sfv are used to verify whether downloads contain the same fingerprint as the files on the server. > > Please let me know any cygwin-ports that may aid in verifying sfv. My Google search only returned > these Unix tools; cksfv, puresfv, and cfv. But I did not find any cygwin-ports. Please let me know > if tools exist under cygwin or how one would compile one of these tools for use with cygwin (btw I > am fairly new to cygwin). > > http://pure-sfv.sourceforge.net/ > http://freshmeat.net/projects/cksfv/ > http://cfv.sourceforge.net/ > The first hit here has a report that sounds encouraging for cksfv. Didn't Google for the others you listed above, though I expect something similar for each. Maybe there are pre-built binaries out there if you look hard enough. But it sounds like a simple 'make' will build it. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/