X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <17190 DOT 86623 DOT qm AT web59108 DOT mail DOT re1 DOT yahoo DOT com> Subject: RE: newlib?: pow function can produce incorrect results. Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:07:52 +0100 Message-ID: <007501c7860c$fc385bf0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <17190.86623.qm@web59108.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 24 April 2007 00:53, Cary R. wrote: > I had some more time to look into this and when the > simple C program I mentioned earlier uses variables > like the other program, incorrect results are > produced. I have attached this C/C++ program. I > certainly don't understand what is going on. I would > have expected pow to be pass-by value which should > make the two calls identical from a system standpoint, > but the results imply something different. Any > suggestions would be greatly appreciated. The notorious PR323. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/