X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:25:01 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: SIGTSTP and select Message-ID: <20070413132501.GG15801@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20070403000723 DOT GG24160 AT cox DOT net> <20070403003753 DOT GA11244 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070403141320 DOT GA3459 AT cox DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070403141320.GA3459@cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Apr 3 10:13, Bob Rossi wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 08:37:53PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 08:07:23PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > > >When ctrl-z is typed, CGDB receives a SIGTSTP on both linux and cygwin. > > >When CGDB is at the select loop and this happens on linux select returns > > >-1 and errno is set to EINTR. My code simple does a 'continue' when this > > >happens and the select loop is reentered. All works well. On cygwin, > > >select does not return with -1. (I didn't check the return value but I > > >can, I just compare to -1 in an if statement). In fact, select also > > >detects that input is ready on stdin. This causes CGDB to get to a read > > >system call (which is non blocking) and the read system call fails with > > >errno set to EAGAIN. This causes CGDB to exit. > > > > > >The main loop looks something like this, > > > if (select (max + 1, &rset, NULL, NULL, NULL) == -1) > > > { > > > if (errno == EINTR) > > > continue; > > > .. > > > } > > > > > > if (FD_ISSET (STDIN_FILENO, &rset)) { > > > handle_stdin > > > } > > > > > >So, my question is, is there a bug with select on cygwin? Is select > > >working properly and I should handle the read call differently? Why does > > >it act differently than linux? > > > > You say that something changed between different releases but you don't > > mention what those releases are. Is this releases of Cygwin? If so, > > what releases? > > > > If this is as easy to demonstrate as you say, then a simple test case > > is definitely called for. > > Hi Christopher, > > Attached is the test case. If I run it under linux, and then type ctrl-z, I > never get into the user_input_loop call. If I run it in cygwin, I do. > > Hopefully I'm doing something wrong here. Please advise! I'm a bit puzzled. I don't see any difference in behaviour on Linux and Cygwin related to your testcase. I have no problems to trigger the user_input_loop call on Linux and Cygwin. After I press ctrl-z, I don't get into it on both systems. After unsuspending the process, I get into user_input_loop on both systems again. Either your testcase is wrong, or you should exactly specify what has to be typed to trigger the problem. I tested this with Cygwin 1.5.24 and Linux 2.6.20.5, btw. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/