X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-AntiVirus: PTMail-AV 0.3-0.90.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean (0.01848 seconds) Message-ID: <460B7C66.1010502@sapo.pt> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:44:22 +0100 From: Roelf Renkema User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Using mysql 5.1.16 beta client libraries on cygwin References: <460AD8D2 DOT 8030909 AT sapo DOT pt> <460ADC85 DOT 2BFCA7F1 AT dessent DOT net> <460B4F62 DOT 9D09523C AT dessent DOT net> In-Reply-To: <460B4F62.9D09523C@dessent.net> OpenPGP: id=54A682E6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000728-2, 28-03-2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian Dessent wrote: > C. The motivation to do this is somewhat sapped by the fact that native > Win32 binaries (and even fancy automated GUI one-click installers) have > existed for the Apache/PHP/MySQL stack for quite a while, so the Windows > user can simply use these if they really need to work with PHP. And I'm > positive that these native versions are much faster than their Cygwin > counterparts. So the only remaining reason for wanting a Cygwin port of > the stack is for people that need to replicate a unix environment as > closely as possibe. But even then, the win32 native ones can come > pretty close in most respects. > > Brian > Just my point Brian, using both os (win,*nix ) in a trail and error environment means that it would be a great help if I could use cygwin's apache in combination with php. Either by bridging f.i. the cgi version or a cygwin native. It would enable me to test a lot of nix stuff on several windows stations I come across. I prefer cygwin because it's faster then the windowed emus around. As you probably know especially when it comes to webservers them paths and permissions can realy be a drag in a php module that should run on both systems. Even though php itself does a great job here. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGC3xm8LhtcVSmguYRAgZdAKC5KVTU/eHF2iMtzCfU7PYNcwzzGwCeMEkb pM1J74CdTuKmCYshsUc4x3Q= =oj1m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/