X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:42:51 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Ton van Overbeek Subject: Re: Libusb-win32-0.1.12.1-1 makes system unusable after reboot. Message-ID: <20070326084251.GA21641@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, Ton van Overbeek References: <20070324151544 DOT GA3541 AT interface DOT famille DOT thibault DOT fr> <20070324200659 DOT X11058-100000 AT xs2 DOT xs4all DOT nl> <20070324192106 DOT GE3541 AT interface DOT famille DOT thibault DOT fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070324192106.GE3541@interface.famille.thibault.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mar 24 20:21, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Actually, I'm wondering: instead of trying to make libusb0.sys work > > > from /usr/lib/libusb/, is it fine (packaging-wise, I mean), in > > > libusb-install, to just copy it into c:\windows\system32\drivers\ and > > > then use the usual libusb-win32 filter setup? That works fine and > > > actually makes the patch simpler... > > > > I am pretty sure that would solve the problem. > > Yes it does, but the question to cygwin developers is: is it ok > packaging-wise? If it helps to work better, it should be ok in this case. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/