X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 20:13:21 +0100 (CET) From: Ton van Overbeek To: Samuel Thibault cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Libusb-win32-0.1.12.1-1 makes system unusable after reboot. In-Reply-To: <20070324151544.GA3541@interface.famille.thibault.fr> Message-ID: <20070324200659.X11058-100000@xs2.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by delorie.com id l2OJDYgK012471 On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hi, > > Ton van Overbeek, le Sat 24 Mar 2007 04:06:09 +0100, a écrit : > > I believe I found the cause of the problem. > > When running cygcheck on /usr/lib/libusb/libusb0.sys I get this: > > > > $ cygcheck /usr/lib/libusb/libusb0.sys > > c:/Cygwin/lib/libusb/libusb0.sys > > Error: could not find usbd.sys <---- !!!! > > Well, this happens with the old version too. But in the new version, > libusb0.sys is started differently from the old version, that possibly > makes the windows-provided usbd.sys discovery fail. > You are right. I get the same cygcheck output with the old version. > > Somehow the Cygwin libusb0.sys must link to usbd.sys with the full path > > i.e. c:\windows\system32\drivers\usbd.sys instead of assuming that > > usbd.sys is located in the same directory as libusb0.sys. > > Err, no, usbd.sys is always installed in > c:\windows\system32\drivers\usbd.sys, and that's precisely because > libusb0.sys is not installed there too that the usual discovery fails. > Yes, I know. But copying usbd.sys to /usr/lib/libusb makes the problem go away. At the next boot loading of libusb0.sys succeeds. See excerpt from ntbtlog.txt below: -------------------------------- .... Loaded driver btkrnl.sys Loaded driver agp440.sys Loaded driver \SystemRoot\System32\DRIVERS\intelppm.sys Loaded driver \SystemRoot\System32\DRIVERS\CmBatt.sys Loaded driver \SystemRoot\System32\DRIVERS\nv4_mini.sys Loaded driver \SystemRoot\System32\DRIVERS\usbuhci.sys Loaded driver \??\c:\Cygwin\lib\libusb\libusb0.sys Loaded driver \??\c:\Cygwin\lib\libusb\libusb0.sys Loaded driver \??\c:\Cygwin\lib\libusb\libusb0.sys Loaded driver \SystemRoot\System32\DRIVERS\usbehci.sys Loaded driver \??\c:\Cygwin\lib\libusb\libusb0.sys Loaded driver \SystemRoot\System32\DRIVERS\b57xp32.sys Loaded driver \??\c:\Cygwin\lib\libusb\libusb0.sys Loaded driver \SystemRoot\System32\DRIVERS\gticard.sys Loaded driver \??\c:\Cygwin\lib\libusb\libusb0.sys Loaded driver \SystemRoot\system32\drivers\tiumfwl.sys Loaded driver \SystemRoot\System32\DRIVERS\bcmwl5.sys Loaded driver \??\c:\Cygwin\lib\libusb\libusb0.sys Loaded driver \SystemRoot\System32\DRIVERS\i8042prt.sys Loaded driver \SystemRoot\System32\DRIVERS\Apfiltr.sys Loaded driver \SystemRoot\System32\DRIVERS\mouclass.sys .... -------------------------------- > Actually, I'm wondering: instead of trying to make libusb0.sys work > from /usr/lib/libusb/, is it fine (packaging-wise, I mean), in > libusb-install, to just copy it into c:\windows\system32\drivers\ and > then use the usual libusb-win32 filter setup? That works fine and > actually makes the patch simpler... > I am pretty sure that would solve the problem. Ton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/