X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <195b3f1f0703182255l376a7cfbyec2f6f1d421ad371@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:55:41 +0900
From: "Wynfield Henman" <wynfield AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Fwd: glib/graphical took kit mem error
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Yes, exactly.  Thanks for the references.

The error has been pointed out.  It is not an emacs error, but one in
cygwin's interal libs/code, as pointed out in the e-mail references
below.   This bug in memory utilization should be fixed by someone
familiar with it, should be able to pick out the slip.

The problem one should thinks is that it could only get worse with vista...

Thanks.

On 3/14/07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> Wynfield Henman wrote:
> > Re: GTK+
> >
> > Me and many people have had problems with cygwin's gtk+ library.
> > I am thankful to all who have made it possible to have gtk+ functionality.
> > However, I (and I believe many others) have run into a problem.
> >
> > The gist of it is that "memalign" needs to be handled specially as
> > cygwin does with "malloc".
> >
> > I don't know how to direct this to, but I would appreciate information
> > regarding this apparent problem.
> >
> >> > The GTK+ build with Cygwin is still broken, unfortunately.
> >> > One way of solving that would be to .....
> >> > treat memalign specially as they do (cygwin) with malloc.
> >
> >
> > Thanks for any input..
>
> <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-02/msg00469.html>
> <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-02/msg00510.html>
>
> --
> Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
____________________________________________________________________
>
> A: Yes.
>  > Q: Are you sure?
>  >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>  >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
>
> --

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/