X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:59:04 -0800
From: Nathan Myers <ncm AT cantrip DOT org>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: a better socketpair
Message-ID: <20070309005904.GM14344@cantrip.org>
References: <20070308223950 DOT GK14344 AT cantrip DOT org> <20070308235215 DOT GB7745 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070309002047 DOT GL14344 AT cantrip DOT org> <20070309003308 DOT GA9357 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070309003308.GA9357@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi Christopher,

Thank you for your quick reply.  I understand that this code might 
not ultimately be useful to cygwin.  It continues to work in my 
project, so I'm not put out.  

I wonder, though, do you know if it might be useful to Mingw?
I.e., might it be worth offering to them, or do you know of a
reason why not to bother?

Google finds lots of complaints about pipes not being usefully 
selectable for writing in cygwin.  Has that been fixed already?

Nathan Myers
ncm AT cantrip DOT org

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/